The table below provides a description of each principle.ĭHS provides transparency for how it handles sensitive information through various mechanisms, including Privacy Impact Assessments, System of Records Notices, Privacy Act Statements, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FIPPs are a set of eight principles that are rooted in the tenets of the Privacy Act of 1974. Fair Information Practice PrinciplesĭHS treats all persons, regardless of immigration status, consistent with the Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs). Violations of these requirements may result in civil and criminal penalties. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) be protected from unauthorized disclosure. The Privacy Act requires that personal information belonging to U.S. He also acknowledged he wasn’t supposed to be sharing the information, prosecutors said, writing in another message, “All of the s- I’ve told you guys I’m not supposed to,” according to the Justice Department’s filing.The Privacy Act provides that federal agencies must protect against the unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) that it collects, disseminates, uses, or maintains. In messages, Teixeira bragged about the scope of information he had access to, writing, “The information I give here is less than half of what’s available,” prosecutors said. “Among the individuals with whom the Defendant shared government information are a number of individuals who represented that they resided in other countries and who logged on to the social media platform using foreign IP addresses,” prosecutors wrote. They have also said there is no allegation that Teixeira ever intended for documents to be distributed widely.ĪLSO READ | China readying supersonic spy drone unit, US military leaks show: Reportīut prosecutors said in their filing Wednesday that one of the servers on the social media platform he posted classified information to had at least 150 users at the time the information was shared and “now may have many more users that are actively seeking access to information.” In their own court filing Wednesday, Teixeira’s lawyers noted there have been many Espionage Act cases in which courts have approved release or the government did not seek to keep the person behind bars pretrial. His lawyer told the judge last month that Teixeira “will answer the charges” and “will be judged by his fellow citizens.” Lawyers for Teixeira, who was arrested last month on charges under the Espionage Act, are urging the judge to release Teixeira to his father’s home, noting that the man didn’t flee when media outlets began publishing his name shortly before his April 13 arrest. “The Defendant even continued to share information with his online associates, defying these admonishments and taking further efforts to conceal his unlawful conduct,” prosecutors wrote. Still, a third memo from February says Teixeira was again observed viewing information “that was not related to his primary duty and was related to the intelligence field.” Teixeira “had previously been notified to focus on his own career duties and to not seek out intelligence products,” the memo said. The memo says Teixeira attended a meeting and proceeded to ask “very specific questions.” He was told again to focus on his job, not any “deep dives” into classified intelligence information. Another memo from late October says a superior had been made aware that Teixeira was “potentially ignoring the cease-and-desist order on deep diving into intelligence information” given to him the month before.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |